An in-depth look at the new-and-improved Orlando Sentinel

The blogosphere has spoken: Going cartoon. Scary. Lipstick on a pig. Abrupt and unconventional.

Here’s one of the funniest ones:

Changes in products as personal and familiar as a newspaper should be undertaken slowly, cautiously, incrementally and thoughtfully.

Oh, sure. How’s that cautious, incremental and thoughtful approach been working lately, dude?

All this reaction to one jpeg of a prototype Orlando Sentinel front that “leaked” out a week and a half ago. (And many thanks to NewsDesigner blogger Mark Friesen for pointing out the leak wasn’t a leak at all.)

Bonita Burton, AME at The Orlando Sentinel, gave us a sneak peek at some of the prototype pages she and her team have been working on this spring. The new design debuts Sunday.

Bo and Stephen

Bo with Sentinel Design Editor Stephen Komives.

Full disclosure: Bonita is a great friend of this blog. Even fuller disclosure: Bonita is a great friend of damn near everyone we know.

Bonita sent us a big batch of pages, answered a bunch of questions, gave us access to an in-house site containing a number of her essays about aspects of the redesign and even sent along a few snapshots of her folks working hard.

What follows is a mix of all this material. The intent is to make you familiar with what the Sentinel will be doing this Sunday.

It might be radical. But it might just make damn good sense, too.

Q: The Tell Zell blog wrote Friday:

The big question the redesign raises is this: where is the engagement over journalism? Why are the Zellots getting excited about how the paper looks? How about the news that goes inside? Not as in, “We’re in charge of the news now.” But “Let’s get more great stories in the paper every day.” I’d welcome that enthusiasm, instead of being compared to a cowardly, confused, frozen monkey.

Your response?

A: Actually, I agree. The point is absolutely to get more great stories in the paper. The challenge is to achieve that while the paper is shrinking both in size and overall newshole.

Since I don’t know how to bend the laws of physics, here’s what we’ve decided to do:

• Redefine what a “great” story is. Stop publishing the non-great ones.
• Tell some stories in shorter ways to accommodate those that really need the space. For instance, we’re briefing most of our trial coverage now so reporters can spend less time in courtrooms and more time on enterprise stories.
• Ruthlessly redesign standing elements to be as economical as possible. For example, the new nameplate is smaller, the new digest takes up less room, the section flags now have information built in, the jump headlines are dying … even the front page ad is getting a half-inch shorter.

In an essay on her in-house redesign site, Bonita writes:

We’ve made cosmetic improvements such as amping up our nameplate and color palette, implementing a new grid structure and re-photographing our columnists. We’ll be updating our typography in August when we launch a second phase. But this effort is really about trying to redefine the art of storytelling. We’ve spent even more time in the newsroom talking about unconventional ways of telling stories, conversational ways of writing headlines and accessible ways of presenting data.

THE FRONT PAGE
* A digest summarizing the top contents of each section
* Provocative voices from our signature columnists
* A “can you believe this?” item to start the day with a smile
* Big local stories–watchdog reports, consumer news, latest trends

New A1

There is no formula for the front page or other section fronts. In fact, a key goal is to get out of the rut of downplaying important stories just because they don’t have art. That’s what this first prototype was designed to demonstrate – that even though the UF art isn’t sexy, there is always a solution for giving visual emphasis to the day’s top story, even when it breaks on deadline as this one did.

Orlando’s New A1

Tickle the thumbnail for a before-
and-after.
Keep in mind this page
is a quick remake of an existing
page.
Live, new pages will reflect
changes in story selection and
construction. Actual mileage
will vary.

Q: So all the hard work your staff has put into this change… how DOES this tie into changes planned at the other Tribune papers?

A: I have no idea. Ours is an approach that looks and feels like Central Florida. It’s doesn’t quite play in, say, Hartford. There are a lot of talented people in Trib newsrooms all over the country, and we’ll see a wide range of creative solutions for different markets.

Q: I seem to recall you writing somewhere that you had a redesign already under way, and that this project kind of grew out of that. Can you correct me or elaborate?

A: My editor asked me about two months ago to update the paper over the summer. We fast-tracked the process and expanded its scope once it became clear our new owners expected a more experimental mindset from its newsrooms. We wanted to make a statement about Orlando as an epicenter of innovation.

Q: I’m not sure whether or not I’ve actually written this in the blog — yet — but your prototype pages seem to me to be a wonderful blend of the quick-read, easily scannable stuff you find in USA Today and the huge, high-impact, smack-you-in-the-face visual play you find in The Virginian-Pilot. How off-base would I be to say this?

A: Some editors, such as those running USA Today and the Pilot, understand the research about how people read and comprehend information. I’d include the Sentinel’s editor, Charlotte Hall, and editors I’ve worked for at the San Jose Mercury News and Orange County Register. They know that readers enter the page through large visuals. And that the most dedicated reader will give you between 10 and 20 minutes – enough time to read 50 to 100 inches of copy. The only thing about the data that’s changing is the amount of time people will give you now.

So yes, I want great stories in our paper. I also want to be sure people read and connect with those stories.

Open house in Orlando

Bo staged a company-wide open house last week. Here, Managing Editor Mark Russell explains the finer points of the new pages.

Q: I know you’ve been frustrated by some of the reaction to the jpeg you sent me last week. You’ve said that this is a prototype page and that the Sentinel will be changing the way stories are chosen, written and edited. How so? What are the major components of this change?

A: The “lipstick on a pig” criticism is an insult to the Sentinel journalists who bust ass every day to keep this paper exciting and relevant.

Since about the beginning of the year, every conversation about a story between reporter and editor has included a discussion about the best format for its audience. Is it based around a lot of numbers? Maybe it should be a chart. Are there strong opposing views? Maybe it should be a pro/con. Is its topic really complex? Maybe it should be a Q&A. Should the subject tell the story in their own words? Should the reporter?

“Unconventional” storytelling doesn’t necessarily mean “shorter.” It just means “interesting.”

We’re also putting more emphasis on headline writing, getting to the point in a more conversational, intriguing way.

Another excerpt from Bo’s essays:

THE SUNDAY FRONT PAGE
* The digest becomes a summary of the top commentary in each section, including that of our editorial cartoonist

We’re pumping up the front page on Sunday to amplify our most provocative and personally useful content inside (lots of colorful columnists, great tips in weekly sections like Homes, Your Money and Travel). We’ve also freed up more real estate for our signature projects and enterprise pieces.

And, oh yes — that cartoon. A way to reference the deeper content of the editorial pages that day with a smile.

Sunday front

Q: The Sunday nameplate seems a little small — especially above all those columnists. Is this intentional? Or is that only the case with this particular sample page?

A: One message we want to reinforce is that our columnists are a huge part of our brand. Until recently, it was rare for any of them to get promotion on A1. There are two areas that distinguish our Sunday paper from the rest of the week: More in-depth commentary and more stories about leisure activities. The Sunday nameplate better promotes both of them without growing out of proportion to the rest of the page.

Sunday fronts

Sunday, before-and-after.

Q: OMG! An editorial cartoon on page one? I spent five years in Des Moines, where we were convinced we were the only paper in the U.S. still running a cartoon on A1. How did this idea come about?

A: Cartoonists are commentators, too. And we have an incredible staff cartoonist who has a national following. Just like all the other columnists tip to their sections, his cartoon tips to our redesigned editorial pages. Also, it just gives readers something to smile about.

From Bo’s redesign primer:

THE OPINION PAGES
* More visual emphasis on key opinions
* More ways for readers to tell us what they think – even submitting their own cartoons
* A quick sampling of the nation’s leading commentary blogs
* Pages on Friday and Saturday dedicated to readers’ comments

Left side OpEd pages Right side OpEd pages
Editorial and Oped pages, before-and-after.

Inside pages will be a huge, huge component of the new Sentinel. From Bo’s essay:

It’s important that the voice and pacing established on the front page carry through the entire book.

We want to showcase some of the lively content we produce for the web . We want to continue to help readers find key information as quickly as possible. And we need to make the most of our tight newshole and strapped editing resources.

Pages 2 and 3 of each section are being redesigned with these challenges in mind.

A2, B2, C2, D2
* Page 2 of every section will reverse-publish smart content that’s now found only on the web. (Blogs, databases, photo galleries, etc.)

A3, B3, C3, D3
* Page 3 of every section is a briefing of that section’s main topics.

On A2 we’ve replaced the canned, out-of-date celebrity news from the wires with items from Hal Bodeker’s and Roger Moore’s entertainment blogs… The newshole that is sometimes available and sometimes not, depending on the ad stack, is now filled with a briefs column that groups findings from the latest studies in one spot. It can slinky or disappear accordingly.

Page 2A

An A2 prototype, before-and-after.

Page A3 is being designed to work as more of a true spread with the new A2.

Page A3

Ditto for A3.

Like A1, we want to give readers an immediate sense of the depth of national/foreign coverage in a scanable way.

The briefs that traditionally run deep inside the section are brought out front and illustrated as part of a daily geography lesson. We’ve also incorporated a digest of the rest of the section’s contents. Each item contains the nut of the story for time-starved readers but also tips to the deeper report on following pages.

Finally, rather than round out the page with four to five traditional stories,we’re honing in on the day’s single most gripping headline and presenting it in an accessible Q& A.

B2 becomes a sampling of some of the best stuff from the day’s local bloggers. While the feature references more of the blogs online, these are meant to be complete items. Go online if you’d like more like content, but you don’t have to go online to get the pertinent details. This space could also be devoted to a single blog if the content merits.

Local gossip columnist Scott Maxwell, who runs here three days each week, moves out to a more prominent spot on the cover.

Page B2
B2

Page B3
B3

B3 becomes a better organized regional roundup, again giving more visual attention to briefs and presenting criminal justice news in a tighter format. Still in progress: A way to repurpose information from the wildly successful crime blog.

One change we’re making in the redesign is to eliminate jump headlines. On a typical open page, this buys us back about 10 inches of space.

Jump page

Note the red bar across the
bottom. That’s the space the
Sentinel saves by eliminating
jump heds.

Back to our Q&A:

Q: You seem to have invested a lot of energy in remaking pages two and three. I’ve picked up your May 13 samples. Are those still fairly accurate to what we’ll see Sunday? Can you elaborate a little more on what you’re intending in this opening spread of each section?

A: Inside pages need love, too. Properly pacing a reader through the entire book is a big part of their experience.

We’ve redesigned our facing pages of every section to read more as a spread. Page two is reverse-published web content (blogs, databases, photo galleries, etc.) and page three is a more topical briefing.

Q: Are you emphasizing blogs a lot more in the new design? Or is that simply an artifact of these specific sample prototype pages?

A: One of the things we’ve learned about our readers is that there is very little cross-over between the paper and the web. Their habits are just too different. So telling people “Go to the web! There’s more online!” was really frustrating them. We have a wealth of provocative content online our reporters are already generating that many people don’t even see. So yes, we’re dedicating a home in print to our best bloggers every day.

After some of the complex ground we’ve covered, the section fronts should be relatively easy. From Bo’s essays:

SECTION FRONTS
* More stories told from a visual perspective
* News stories told in easy-to-grasp ways
* Fast facts about topics in the news
* More emphasis on our signature columnists

Local front sports pages Business front

Left to right: Local, Sports and Biz; before-and-after.

orlando homes section

An added bonus for our blog readers:
The page on the right is the first live
page built for Sunday’s paper.

From Bo’s essays:

The redesign of Business page 3 completes the major work we’ll unveil on June 22. This page contains a more visual and economical way to package the market summary — even after we added the Dilbert cartoon and bumped the agate up to a readable point size, we pick up about five more inches on the page.

Business page three

An inside biz page.

Q: I sense pride in the sample inside biz page you showed me. It’s bolder and stronger, that’s for sure. But what is it about business pages that get you so revved up?

A: Some of the best years of my post-reporting life were spent designing business pages in places like Silicon Valley, so it has a soft spot in my heart. Next to the editorial pages, business pages are the most neglected by designers across the board. But the topic — the intersection of power and money — is extremely important. It’s a tough challenge to make such data-laden information easy to understand.

I guess solving those kinds of challenges is what my job is all about. And I think a paper’s design is only as good as its agate.

Features front

Features, before-and-after.

Q: Where is your features section? Is it inside E/Health and Fitness?

A: Our features sections are themed every day. Travel & Arts, Health & Fitness, Cooking & Eating, Style & Trends, Calendar and Home Fix-Up. All the typical puzzles/comics/advice columns run there.

Orlando page toppers
Sample section-front headers

Q: You’re going with a color-coded section front system, a la USA Today. But you’re displaying art a bit larger than Richard Curtis and his crew usually do. Are you concerned about poor color juxtapositions? What happens when your lede sports art clashes with red, for example?

A: Central Florida is a bright, colorful place. Our paper should be, too. We’re already color-coding sections, we’re just going to a more vibrant palette.

What clashes with red? ;-)

Balloon drop

Design editor Todd Stewart and artist
Karen Bellville installing the ceiling for
the balloon drop when the first edition
rolls off the press.

Q: Older readers are sometimes awfully resistant to change. And let’s face it: There are a lot of retired folks in Florida. What is the Sentinel doing to prepare for backlash from this major change?

A: Well, the way I see it, the nationwide backlash against newspapers has been going on for a long time now. Readers have been pleading with us for change, and we’ve been very slow to listen or respond. For the Sentinel, standing still — or only incrementally changing — is no longer an option.

Bo wrapped up one of her essays by offering kudos all around:

Hard to believe we’ve actually reached this point. A big shout-out to Design Editor Stephen Komives, his ace designers Wes Meltzer and Nick Masuda, and the CCI implementation team led by Fran Coker for their tireless dedication in getting this off the ground.

Komives

Design editor Stephen Komives gives a
thumbs up on some parallel workflow.

Q: You’re saying typefaces will change in phase two, this fall. Do you have fonts picked out yet? Or is that what you’ll be doing this summer?

A: Flama and Expresso. We’re also redesigning our business and entertainment tabs. Stay tuned!

Flama typeface Expresso typeface
Left: Flama. Right: Expresso. These samples are from Feliciano Type Foundary. Bo’s actual supplier may vary.

The pages are looking great, Bo, and I just love the thinking behind what your folks have been up to.

Best wishes for a successful launch this Sunday!

18 Responses to “An in-depth look at the new-and-improved Orlando Sentinel”

  1. Rich Says:

    Love both Flama and Expresso fonts. Can’t wait to see the complete look. Also like the A1 columnists teasers.

  2. Francie Says:

    I. Love. It. It’s totally Central Florida, which I spend a lot of time in. You guys rock.

  3. Mondomania Says:

    This may be the worst redesign I have ever seen, and I’ve seen plenty in the past 20 years in this business. It’s also pretty much a direct lifting of the South Florida Sun-Sentinel, and we know how well THEY are doing. BLACK and RED?

    Of course, the fact that this redesign (what is this, the third in the past 4 years?) will accomplish nothing but drive away even more readers (mark my words) will be lost in the self-congratulatory bloviating that goes on on this blog. And that’s all that matters, right?

  4. John Zhu Says:

    Thank you Charles and Bo for the in-depth look. Very informative.

    While Bo did say that the initial A1 page shown was just a prototype, when it’s the first page you release from a redesign, that fact alone gives it more weight since it implies that this is the model you are going for.

    I think a good chunk of the negative reaction from the blogosphere to the redesign stems from the general dislike for Zell. It’s unfortunate, but really, who can blame them?

    That said, I think one can reasonably criticize parts of this redesign without having it stem from a “bash all things Zell” mentality. Honestly, I was not a fan of the first prototype page; still am not, and some of my dislike involves the furniture, not just the content that was pulled from the old page. However, I do like many of the inside pages and section fronts MUCH better.

    A few comments/questions:

    – I like the goal of playing up important stories even if there is no photos. Making something out of nothing is the best part of visual journalism, IMHO.

    – Bo lists says one of the Sentinel’s new objectives is to “Redefine what a “great” story is”. Can we get a little more explanation on this point? What does the Sentinel consider a “great” piece of journalism now, and how does that differ from its definition before?

    – Regarding this line: “Oh, sure. How’s that cautious, incremental and thoughtful approach been working lately, dude?”

    So does that mean it’s time for the reckless, go-for-broke, thoughtless approach? I’m as frustrated as anyone by newspapers’ slow pace for change, but the solution to that is an openness to change rather than simply going in the farthest opposite direction possible. Drastic change doesn’t necessarily equal good change, and change can be minor and effective. I also question if the Sentinel’s makeover had been more incremental, whether it would be criticized here for failing to break out of the cautious, incremental and thoughtful mindset.

    – I like the reorganization of the inside pages, and the increased emphasis on design and art for those pages.

    – It seems like only yesterday (or was it a week or so ago?) that most of the newspaper design world, or at least many of the voices on this site, were preaching the “respect your readers’ intelligence, don’t shout the news at them, clean is good” philosophy. We scorned feature art treatment for news, reverse type over color backgrounds, big swatches of color, and shaded boxes. I’m not saying one approach is better than the other, but one has to admit that we’ve witnessed what seems to be a very drastic shift in attitude in a very short amount of time. Perhaps it just goes to show that after a design reaches a certain degree of quality, how good it actually is is more about how you spin it: Is it “clean” or is it “dull”? Is it “provocative” or “overwhelming”? Word choice can be everything.

    – I like the new approach of quicker reads and more illustrations, but it’s also more labor-intensive to produce. While the prototypes look good, how does the Sentinel plan to ensure it has the manpower necessary to produce work equal to that quality on a daily basis, especially since it doesn’t look like any Tribune paper (or any paper for that matter) is adding staff anytime soon? Or were the prototypes constructed with daily practicality as a consideration and thus don’t require more time to produce than the more traditional pages?

    – While I like the “geography lesson” briefs package, I feel like a big part of its appeal is due to the fact that it’s different. But that novelty factor wears off quickly when that same look is presented on a daily basis. If the main map visual is the same day after day, I think you might be better served dumping the map and reclaiming that space for more briefs and better brief-specific visuals that would vary day to day.

    More of my previous ramblings about the redesign here:

    http://www.john-zhu.com/blog/?p=95
    http://www.john-zhu.com/blog/?p=106

    Thanks again for the in-depth look. Good luck with the redesign launch.

  5. Denise Covert Says:

    Congrats, Bo. That’s a lot of change, and a lot of it is radical, but it all makes sense from a common-sense point of view, and you guys are definitely practicing what your higher-ups are preaching. I hope the reader response is positive. Good luck on Sunday. :-)

  6. Stuart C. Says:

    Wow. This is atrocious. I feel like I entered a time machine and landed in 1986.

  7. Charles Apple Says:

    Geez, some folks really burn my britches…
    .
    There are three comments I’ve not approved in response to this post. The third one came in this morning. It says, in part:
    .
    > Interesting how all negative comments are
    > deleted. Ironic that we’re in a business
    > that depends on the First Amendment for
    > its very survival.
    .
    Let me address your comment.
    .
    First of all, this is MY blog. Not a newspaper. The first amendment doesn’t apply here. Never did.
    .
    You want the first amendment, start your own blog. That’s how the internet works.
    .
    Secondly, I habitually allow all sorts of negative posts. Quite frequently, in fact. However, I rarely let through negative ANONYMOUS posts. Like the kind you posted, Mr. asshole with the Yahoo address.
    .
    You know the funniest part? Three negative comments, three anonymous posts. Each from a different Yahoo address.
    .
    BUT ALL THREE FROM THE SAME IP ADDRESS.
    .
    First amendment, my ass.
    .
    You want your comment posted, leave your REAL name and your REAL e-mail address. If it’s a thoughtful comment — or hell, even a pertinent complaint, concern, objection or question — up it posts, here in the blog.
    .
    But if you’re just some douchebag, repeatedly trolling me from bogus e-mail accounts, making wild, anonymous accusations and so on… hell, no I won’t post your venom. Go play somewhere else. This here’s MY playground, Opie.
    .
    Might I suggest posting to the Wenalway board? :)

  8. Will Says:

    Good for them for trying something new. Even if so many bloggers hate it, whatever, at least the Sentinel is going for it and putting their blood, sweat and tears into this redesign.

    It’s radical, yes. But a change that is supposed to create a difference needs to be radical. Who can say that a redesign isn’t going to increase readership? Nobody has had the guts to do something this radical yet, so nobody knows what this will do.

    Everyone’s always talking about bringing younger readers to the paper, and as a twenty-one-year-old, I’d be much more inclined to pick up the redesigned Sentinel over the old one.

    Good job, team. I think you guys are going to have some really profound and positive results over the next few weeks, months and hopefully years. I admire you for being the first ones willing to take such a radical leap into the 21st century.

  9. Robb Montgomery Says:

    It has been Visual Editors long standing policy to require real names in posts and replies. The VizEds bloggers are, of course, free to set their own bar for the discourse they convene in their realms, but the real name rule still holds water. Requiring real names raises the level of debate everywhere it is used.

  10. Ben Ramsden Says:

    It looks great. It’s very bold! I really hope this works, and it sets a tone in the industry that newspapers are still worth reading.

    Best of luck, Orlando!!!!

  11. Lin Shapley Says:

    Thanks for the in-depth look and “Behind the Music” information — good luck with the launch, Orlando!

  12. Mike Higdon Says:

    As a young person I’m excited to be in journalism again. We’re finally adapting. You can see it in all corners of the US. Too bad it’s not everywhere, but it’s growing. Makes me want to be a part of it as a designer and a journalist.

    Everything I have to say about the redesign has been said though. So ditto.

  13. Mike Higdon Says:

    PS. great post Charles, way to stick it to the blogosphere

  14. John T. Garcia Says:

    Good luck Bo, Stephen and the rest of the OS staff (you know who you are).

    Thanks for the impressive reporting Charles (and your great message in the comments).

    And finally, good luck to us all. If this redesign takes off, all of might be scrambling to try to copy it.

  15. Colin Smith Says:

    First, I want to congratulate the entire Sentinel team for creating what can only be described as a truly reader-centric design. This is the type of newspaper I want on my doorstep every morning — it’s engaging, energetic, fun and almost infinitely scalable depending on how much time I have. And I especially love those opinion pages, great ideas implemented well.

    I must admit I was taken aback a bit by the wide text measures and grids on the covers but, like any good reader, I’ll get over it (then complain when this design changes).

    And implementing the new typefaces is a really good idea (that I’ll quite possibly have to steal). You get a new design out there to readers while keeping a nod to the past. And no complaints about the body type getting smaller. I kid … you’ll still get complaints about the body type. At least this way the design can be praised (or panned, I suppose) on the Big Ideas rather than getting caught up in the minutia of whether or not you made the bridge column type smaller.

    Anyway, kudos all around for creating a lively, engaging product. I can’t wait to get my hands on an issue.

    Cheers (and good luck)!

  16. Ken Carpenter Says:

    Bo . . . wear that Minnesota WIld sweater more often! Maybe the sports department will realize there’s an NHL team 80 miles down I-4!

  17. Ken Carpenter Says:

    Call it obligation to an industry I love, or affection for colleagues I once worked alongside, or civic duty . . . Call it what you will, but I increased my Orlando Sentinel subscription from Sunday only to seven days a week.

  18. Calli Says:

    It seems like the number of ads have increased significantly as the number of reporters have dwindled. Columnists like Scott Joseph, who had a critically honest take, have been replaced with folks like Heather McPherson, who doesn’t seem to give a negative review.

    I’m glad to know that some folks like this new, “improved” version as we’re planning on dropping our subscription soon.

 

Leave a Reply