<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hartford Courant reverts to more conventional A1 look</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.visualeditors.com/apple/2009/06/hartford-courant-reverts-to-more-conventional-a1-look/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.visualeditors.com/apple/2009/06/hartford-courant-reverts-to-more-conventional-a1-look/</link>
	<description>www.visualeditors.com/apple</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 21:22:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Scott Griffin</title>
		<link>http://www.visualeditors.com/apple/2009/06/hartford-courant-reverts-to-more-conventional-a1-look/comment-page-1/#comment-32211</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Griffin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 02:22:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.visualeditors.com/apple/?p=10141#comment-32211</guid>
		<description>Just got back into town. Took a quick look at the new/newer Courants on the doorstep. I might be wrong, but it looks like 1A is all they changed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just got back into town. Took a quick look at the new/newer Courants on the doorstep. I might be wrong, but it looks like 1A is all they changed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iBlogWestHartford</title>
		<link>http://www.visualeditors.com/apple/2009/06/hartford-courant-reverts-to-more-conventional-a1-look/comment-page-1/#comment-32210</link>
		<dc:creator>iBlogWestHartford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 02:13:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.visualeditors.com/apple/?p=10141#comment-32210</guid>
		<description>I have to admit, the ONLY change to the (now) "old" Courant that I liked was the vertical masthead.  It was different, it was unique, it was cool (and honestly, we all KNOW the name of the paper, right?)  

All the other changes to the design seemed to be about either:
1) Hiding the fact of shrinking content (sorry, can't be done), or
2) Mimicking website design (which just doesn't fly on the printed page, guys.)  The blue words at the end of each "Quick Take" scream "Click on me - I'm a hyperlink!"  But where's the mouse??

Now the paper looks like something out of the early 1960s.  The blue is sickly, passive, Tribune-light.  The front page says: "We don't know what direction to take - so we're trying hard to take none at all." 

And not to get too much into content, but look at what is offered on the sample (which the design, one assumes, is meant to complement): a space-eating photo for a story about a gimmicky TV show; a sports story; ONE genuine "news" story; and a bunch of super-shrunk summaries with dead links, dominated by a space-eating photo (an ad, actually) for a dead TV pitchman.

As a Connecticut resident, I'd dearly love to have something more substantial on my porch every morning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to admit, the ONLY change to the (now) &#8220;old&#8221; Courant that I liked was the vertical masthead.  It was different, it was unique, it was cool (and honestly, we all KNOW the name of the paper, right?)  </p>
<p>All the other changes to the design seemed to be about either:<br />
1) Hiding the fact of shrinking content (sorry, can&#8217;t be done), or<br />
2) Mimicking website design (which just doesn&#8217;t fly on the printed page, guys.)  The blue words at the end of each &#8220;Quick Take&#8221; scream &#8220;Click on me - I&#8217;m a hyperlink!&#8221;  But where&#8217;s the mouse??</p>
<p>Now the paper looks like something out of the early 1960s.  The blue is sickly, passive, Tribune-light.  The front page says: &#8220;We don&#8217;t know what direction to take - so we&#8217;re trying hard to take none at all.&#8221; </p>
<p>And not to get too much into content, but look at what is offered on the sample (which the design, one assumes, is meant to complement): a space-eating photo for a story about a gimmicky TV show; a sports story; ONE genuine &#8220;news&#8221; story; and a bunch of super-shrunk summaries with dead links, dominated by a space-eating photo (an ad, actually) for a dead TV pitchman.</p>
<p>As a Connecticut resident, I&#8217;d dearly love to have something more substantial on my porch every morning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Douglas E. Jessmer</title>
		<link>http://www.visualeditors.com/apple/2009/06/hartford-courant-reverts-to-more-conventional-a1-look/comment-page-1/#comment-32120</link>
		<dc:creator>Douglas E. Jessmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 22:35:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.visualeditors.com/apple/?p=10141#comment-32120</guid>
		<description>The nameplate's been tampered with! WHERE'S THE PERIOD?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The nameplate&#8217;s been tampered with! WHERE&#8217;S THE PERIOD?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim McBee</title>
		<link>http://www.visualeditors.com/apple/2009/06/hartford-courant-reverts-to-more-conventional-a1-look/comment-page-1/#comment-32099</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim McBee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 15:35:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.visualeditors.com/apple/?p=10141#comment-32099</guid>
		<description>Straighten up those deck chairs!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Straighten up those deck chairs!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

