<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sunday&#8217;s Apollo 11 tribute pages</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.visualeditors.com/apple/2009/07/sundays-apollo-11-tribute-pages/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.visualeditors.com/apple/2009/07/sundays-apollo-11-tribute-pages/</link>
	<description>www.visualeditors.com/apple</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 13:28:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike Higdon</title>
		<link>http://www.visualeditors.com/apple/2009/07/sundays-apollo-11-tribute-pages/comment-page-1/#comment-34165</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Higdon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 19:31:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.visualeditors.com/apple/?p=10752#comment-34165</guid>
		<description>I wonder how many stories got the Neil Armstrong quote wrong. He didn't say "One small step for man, one giant leap for mankind" he said "One small step for a man, one giant leap for mankind" because Armstrong ain't a redundant dummy, his radio gear just sucks.

Also find it weird that the Sunday Press' headline quote is wrong: 'One giant step' seeing as no one said giant step, Armstrong said 'giant leap'

Surprised more front pages aren't more interesting/varied.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder how many stories got the Neil Armstrong quote wrong. He didn&#8217;t say &#8220;One small step for man, one giant leap for mankind&#8221; he said &#8220;One small step for a man, one giant leap for mankind&#8221; because Armstrong ain&#8217;t a redundant dummy, his radio gear just sucks.</p>
<p>Also find it weird that the Sunday Press&#8217; headline quote is wrong: &#8216;One giant step&#8217; seeing as no one said giant step, Armstrong said &#8216;giant leap&#8217;</p>
<p>Surprised more front pages aren&#8217;t more interesting/varied.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Voros</title>
		<link>http://www.visualeditors.com/apple/2009/07/sundays-apollo-11-tribute-pages/comment-page-1/#comment-34091</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Voros</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 20:21:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.visualeditors.com/apple/?p=10752#comment-34091</guid>
		<description>Really like the Then &#38; Now graphic by Alberto and Jay. Wionderful job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really like the Then &amp; Now graphic by Alberto and Jay. Wionderful job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brett Mickelson</title>
		<link>http://www.visualeditors.com/apple/2009/07/sundays-apollo-11-tribute-pages/comment-page-1/#comment-34083</link>
		<dc:creator>Brett Mickelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 15:50:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.visualeditors.com/apple/?p=10752#comment-34083</guid>
		<description>I just looked and can confirm that the Associated Press definitely did publish the bootprint photo upside-down.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just looked and can confirm that the Associated Press definitely did publish the bootprint photo upside-down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William Neff</title>
		<link>http://www.visualeditors.com/apple/2009/07/sundays-apollo-11-tribute-pages/comment-page-1/#comment-34058</link>
		<dc:creator>William Neff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 10:15:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.visualeditors.com/apple/?p=10752#comment-34058</guid>
		<description>Okay, after 25 years of seeing and producing these graphics I thought I'd seen it all, but I have to admit, that Orlando Sentinel graphic is the first time I have ever seen anyone suggest that an astronaut would actually sit on the ascent engine cover during the ascent. I wonder if there were errors of that magnitude in the story as well? And if not -- why the double standard? I regret what this says about a news artist's standing as a journalist, and I do not accept it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, after 25 years of seeing and producing these graphics I thought I&#8217;d seen it all, but I have to admit, that Orlando Sentinel graphic is the first time I have ever seen anyone suggest that an astronaut would actually sit on the ascent engine cover during the ascent. I wonder if there were errors of that magnitude in the story as well? And if not &#8212; why the double standard? I regret what this says about a news artist&#8217;s standing as a journalist, and I do not accept it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

