<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yet another obtrusive ad</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.visualeditors.com/apple/2009/10/yet-another-obtrusive-ad/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.visualeditors.com/apple/2009/10/yet-another-obtrusive-ad/</link>
	<description>www.visualeditors.com/apple</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 02:03:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: tbone</title>
		<link>http://www.visualeditors.com/apple/2009/10/yet-another-obtrusive-ad/comment-page-1/#comment-49661</link>
		<dc:creator>tbone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 18:09:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.visualeditors.com/apple/?p=13513#comment-49661</guid>
		<description>Take the money and run</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Take the money and run</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Lynch</title>
		<link>http://www.visualeditors.com/apple/2009/10/yet-another-obtrusive-ad/comment-page-1/#comment-49319</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Lynch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 17:02:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.visualeditors.com/apple/?p=13513#comment-49319</guid>
		<description>Scary lines indeed. 

What happens when one of these front pages carries a story that the advertiser is likely to find offensive? Will there be pressure to hold the story a day? Move it inside? Or if it runs, does the newsroom face the music the next day? 

I know those kinds of conflicts exist already, but with these unique and premium placements (and prices), the stakes are much higher. 

I'd be interested to know what kinds of policies are in place to address such issues  at papers where these kinds of ads are running.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scary lines indeed. </p>
<p>What happens when one of these front pages carries a story that the advertiser is likely to find offensive? Will there be pressure to hold the story a day? Move it inside? Or if it runs, does the newsroom face the music the next day? </p>
<p>I know those kinds of conflicts exist already, but with these unique and premium placements (and prices), the stakes are much higher. </p>
<p>I&#8217;d be interested to know what kinds of policies are in place to address such issues  at papers where these kinds of ads are running.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Casey Rogers</title>
		<link>http://www.visualeditors.com/apple/2009/10/yet-another-obtrusive-ad/comment-page-1/#comment-49318</link>
		<dc:creator>Casey Rogers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 16:16:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.visualeditors.com/apple/?p=13513#comment-49318</guid>
		<description>I've seen ads like that on Web sites, will readers notice a difference?

That's a nicely cropped photo on that Foster package, btw.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve seen ads like that on Web sites, will readers notice a difference?</p>
<p>That&#8217;s a nicely cropped photo on that Foster package, btw.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

