Visual Editors
Visual Editors, NFP was incorporated as a 501(c)(3) non-profit in 2004.
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Greg Swanson
Tiki Lounger

Joined: 24 Feb 2005
Posts: 9
Location: The Octagon
Posted:
Sat Aug 25, 2007 3:05 pm
|
|
| |
I am but a casual traveler through these threads. I must say though, that, Billy, you do give off the smell of a man who is crediting much to your A1 toppers. You say you don't, but most arguments have that as the foundation.
I must agree with Steve that your take on the numbers is wrong. A newspaper can only be compared to itself when it comes to circulation. You do get a gold star for your cool map you included in one of your responses, no matter if it was off target.
Your argument means that if the local weekly printed a million copies then it would be able to compare its numbers with the LAT. I think you even see the flaws in that.
Your Shrek argument doesn't hold water either. Yes, your "pop" got them up to the newspaper, but I doubt each buyer then sifted through the pages to make sure your content was worth the 50 cents. You have to build credit with readers on something like that. If your topper looks great and says "John Doe explains why this Shrek is a turd" then readers will buy because John Doe has a reputation among your readers. You can't assume content purchases unless your reputation warrants it, like, say the LAT's reputation or the Chicago Tribune or New York Times.
Believe me, I worked at a newspaper that tried all kinds of crazy stuff. Some of it worked. Some of it didn't. Some things we knew (or thought) were great but our readers didn't respond and we stopped doing them. I'm not saying your topper should be scrapped. It just shouldn't be your introduction every time you enter a newspaper discussion about Bakersfield. _________________ Fighting solves everything. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
| |
|
|