Visual Editors
Visual Editors, NFP was incorporated as a 501(c)(3) non-profit in 2004.
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
| Charticles |
| I've heard of them, but never saw one |
|
3% |
[ 1 ] |
| I've been doing them for years, but I thought they were called infographics |
|
46% |
[ 12 ] |
| I've never heard of them |
|
50% |
[ 13 ] |
|
| Total Votes : : 26 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Josh Awtry
VizEds Moderator

Joined: 11 May 2004
Posts: 375
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Posted:
Tue Jan 03, 2006 3:43 pm
|
|
| |
Here in Salt Lake, we do much charticle.
I'd been doing them for years, and using the term "non-linear storytelling" -- in part because it made me sound smart, and in part because I wanted to encourage reporters that they could still convey information in it (hence the storytelling).
Here's a link to an oldish Poynter article where Chip Scanlan and I talked about it. I didn't want to use the term infographic, because there's not always much "graphic" to it, and wanted to save the term for special graphics. I've also heard the term "chunky text" (I think Patty Cox in St. Pete sold me on that one).
At the Salt Lake Tribune, charticle is the nom de plume of these things, so I rode along with it. I think Tufte coined it, and Tribune staffers picked it up after a visit by Pegie Stark Adam before I got here.
Call it whatever you want, it's a great reader service. It allows readers to pick up the pieces they want and throw out the rest. I usually tell stubborn reporters that it's like a paragraph indent on super steroids: both are designed to allow readers a place back in if they stop reading, but the charticle/nonlinear story/chunky text piece can do that a lot more effectively in a lot of cases.
(In case you can't tell, I'm a big proponent of this type of storytelling. If the reporter doesn't have a thrilling narrative to wow the readers with, this type of work at least enables the clear flow of information.) _________________ --
When I die, put a 'what's next?' box on my tombstone. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
| |
|
|