Well, here’s some proof that my last post isn’t quite accurate. I just haven’t had anything intelligent to say lately.
Unfortunately, they misspelled my name. That’s just not right. Journalists are supposed to be accurate, aren’t they?
So, if it’s okay to put an infographic on the front page, when should you do it? For me, the key criterion is the same as with everything you want to put on page one: look closely at the content and answer the question: How much do my readers care about this?
And also, does a graphic work? As designer Douglas E. Jessner of The Detroit News wrote on the popular online forum Visual Editors last year: “… graphics, photos, stories and non-narrative elements are all created equal. Just as you don’t use a screwdriver to hammer nails, you don’t use a story when a graphic will work better. Choose the items that produce maximum impact for your front, then jump the rest inside.”
(Jessner’s comments are part of a full discussion among designers on Visual Editors, chain titled “Where do graphics belong?”)
It’s JESSMER. With an M. Pronounced with two syllables. Damn French Canadians had to give me a name no one can spell.
Anyway, if you read this blog, maybe once in a while — such as the stopped clock being right twice a day — you’ll glean something important here.
Thanks to John V. Smith of New York Newsday for pointing the link out to me.

Latest Comments
Jim McBee
doug, Rknil, Rknil, j., Rknil, Rknil, Catherine McKinney
Andrew M. Roman
doug, Rknil, doug, Rknil, Dean Lockwood
Rknil, doug, Rknil, doug, Rknil
Rknil, Bryan Rothamel